A short essay for men only: Playboy
In 1962 on the way to my cousin’s house for Christmas, my
mother suddenly realized that we had no gift for my cousin’s husband Ben (name
changed to protect my sorry ass). My
father pulled into a roadside store and after some prolonged shopping (possible
three minutes worth) came out with a Playboy magazine. My mother was flummoxed but recovered herself
enough to say, as she looked distractedly out the car window at snow banks and towering
pine forest beyond, “Well, I’ve heard they have very good articles.”
Fast forward to Christmas 2010 or so, and this is the same Ben
(now probably 76-ish) that has become known as the “Taser Bunny” of the local
police. It seems he was pulled over by a
cruiser at 2 am for possible drunk driving after a high speed chase. He was after all driving his Yamaha Skimobile
down a tar road with no snow on it and making a spray of hell fire as his metal
front skis abraded away. Yet, resisting
arrest for DWI is not why he was tased, rather he was tased because he did not
understand why the local gendarmerie would not return his loaded shotgun. Of course, there are two sides to every story
and I have been overseas so long never heard his side. This maybe is because my cousin, wife of the
Taser Bunny, is still upset about the Playboy magazine that once ruined the
true meaning of Christmas so many years ago and can no longer talk about her
husband of possible 40 years, I lose count - objectively.
No, people have never bought Playboy for the articles. The magazine certainly attracted gifted
writers such as Norman Mailer and Philip Roth and interviewed politicians (Jimmy
Carter, Martin Luther King) and many (if not most ) of our cultural icons.1
Yet, not much hard news came out of the magazine. It’s almost as if these notables were showing
up at the hippest nightclub. It was
almost as if they were all on the make themselves. So when Ben taped the Miss December 1962 centerfold
to the chimney in the living room under a very jolly and flushed Santa, the
juxtaposition was not a success, although I’m sure he thought it was funny. No, I think he was spoiling for some marital
discord to spice up an otherwise dull family event - and over the years discord
is what he’s got big time.
Of course, Playboy in the 60s is tame by today’s
standards. First, along came Penthouse
and Hustler and the term “full frontal nudity” was a red line in the sand for
our culture. This lasted for a decade or
so. But with the advent of DVDs and CDs
porn, which always had been a pretty good business, became big business. The red lines and negative stigma attached to
viewing or even making porn became pretty indistinct. And then the Internet arrived and . . . you
know the rest.
I have for the last week or so been looking at a lot of porn
on the Internet. I know my bad. In my defense I would point out that I have
been deathly sick and during my illness most of the testosterone washed out of
my body. So as I see it, looking at porn
is a type of therapy to rebuild my testosterone level. Even if you don’t buy this, at 70 I need all
the help I can get. And even if you
don’t buy this, I’ve always thought that a naked woman was nature’s way of
saying hello – and in my case as I recover to life, sort of welcome back to the
living, Forrest. And lastly in watching
porn, I’ve been playing cat and mouse with the Thai censors. Thailand has become a military dictatorship
so I’m striking a blow for freedom (that’s freedom and not femdom).
So I thought I give you my Pros and Johns account of the
geography of pornography.
The cons
1. Smut
today leaves noting to the imagination and that’s a shame. I’m glad the days at the Lichfield drive-in
where soft porn movies could run for two hours are gone. But now the average viewing time of porn is
three minutes or less followed by what a female historian – speaking of Louis
16th failure to get his wife pregnant – a “happy ending” outside of
the vagina. Creative thought is over
before it has begun.
2. Justice
Potter Stewart once said: I don’t know
what Pornography is, but I know it when I see it. Maybe, but I have much better luck with bad
taste – which is rife on Internet porn.
I don’t begrudge little people (midgets) or the morbidly obese a sex
life, and I’m sure lots of people have made love in a bathroom (mea culpa), but
I don’ need to watch these clips. I also
rule out any clip which shows defecation or squirting. Sex with animals is out, too as is rough sex
(rape) and snuff flicks (which I have not found on my Internet voyage). There are several other categories that
generally, but not always, fall into the bad taste category. You know bad taste when you see it, but pornography
is a little harder to be sure of.
3. Alvin
Dark (a manager and .300 NL hitter) once described Carl Yastrzemski as the best
player in baseball from the neck down.
The Greeks loved the male
form. The statues of David and others dominated
art in the ancient world. The Olympics
were all male and participants were naked, ergo more statues. Form over function was the rule, I
guess.
Too
many porn clips have Vargas girls (another gift from Playboy) being screwed by
guys we only see from the waist down somewhat like Yaz, or wearing executioner
masks, or so ugly I see them as probably part time janitors at ball parks with
losing baseball team. They may sport
outsized erections, but the mismatch of beauty is gauche. Can a naked man not be beautiful? After all, porn like hockey is a game that
average white men can play, too.
4. Say
Cheese. Sex is the most fun you can have
(with or without your pants on), so why not smile a little more?
5. Wise
Blood, Flannery O’Conner’s novel, was (at least for me) ultimately a failure
because she tried to use farce to talk about faith and religion –serious things
and that shouldn’t be done. I feel the
same way about porn clips that use farce.
I dislike clips with Santa Claus themes, although there may be deep
seated reasons for my dread of Santa having sex.
The Pros
1. Japanese anime
(or hentai both deal with sexual topics) is getting so realistic that only the
animator knows for sure whether it was shot with a camera or digitally drawn. I am guessing that these realistic graphics
are the follow ons from the video gaming industry. But the
total control the animator has over his materials is heady stuff, and allows focus
and story lines rarely seen in typical clips.
2. Japanese
porn girls are often smiling, no matter what the situation – I like this. And although I have no idea what they’re
saying, their voices sound like a little girl relating a tea party she had for
her dolls and stuffed animals. “Oh, Mr.
Bear your cup is empty. Let me fill it
for you with hot tea.”
3. The
Summer of ’42. Generally, if they are
well done like the movie, I like mature women showing much younger boys and
girls the ropes. No older woman ever
took a passing sexual interest in me, so I can’t critique these clips. I don’t watch the reverse either because an
older man with sexually naïve youngsters seems doomed to be in bad taste. And ,no, no older man has ever taken asexual
interest in me.
[I am going to stop my list here for several reasons.
First, I’d have to get into technical terms like bukkake,
creampie, twink, katoey or fluffer and
my readers might lose interest.
Second, there are more porn clips on the Internet than there
are grains of sand on a beach. (Diogenes wouldn’t be looking for an honest man
today, he’d be looking for a good-looking middle aged woman who hasn’t done an
MILF clip.) So I worry that my work may
not be statistically valid.
Third, there’d be all those Nosey Parkers who – even though
I said for men only, didn’t I? – who just want to cause trouble. They’re the ones you see walking around with a
sandwich board that says: Men who watch porn don’t believe in Immaculate
Conception. You can pick them out
because they’re typically wearing a white beard and Santa suit.
Fourth, all this may not end in the happy ending I long for
and which I hope is coming apace.]
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_in_Playboy_2010%E2%80%9319 The list of notables who have been
interviewed or submitted to Playboy’s 20 Questions I find amazing. You can pick a decade at the bottom.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home